Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 13, 2026

AULA F75 vs Qwertykeys Neo60 Core75% Layout or Aluminum

Choose the AULA F75 for its 75% layout, media knob, RGB and 1000 Hz polling, or the Neo60 Core for its aluminum case, VIA support and range of plate materials.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Battery

AULA F75

EPOMAKER x AULA F75

4.5 (510)

$42at Epomaker

90-day low

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

AULA F75

Battery

Build quality in the top 30% of 75% boards under $50.

If you want

  • 75% layout with a media knob and multimedia keys.
  • RGB lighting and a listed 1000 Hz polling rate.
  • Gasket mount with sound dampening and screw-in stabilizers.

Rules this board out

  • North-facing LEDs. Cherry-profile keycaps can hit the switch housing.
  • South-facing LEDs. Shine-through legends stay dark, and some sculpted keycaps can clip the LED.
  • No ISO layout. ISO-DE, UK, and other ISO variants are not offered.
  • No numpad.

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo60 Core

Build quality in the top 15% of 60% boards under $50.

If you want

  • Aluminum unibody case with stainless steel or copper weight options described by the vendor.
  • VIA support and PCB gasket or O-ring mounting options.
  • Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, FR4, POM and plastic plate options are listed.

Rules this board out

  • Compact layout only. No function row, dedicated arrow keys, or numpad.

Bottom line

Choose the AULA F75 if you want its 75% key layout, RGB, media knob and listed 1000 Hz polling rate. Choose the Qwertykeys Neo60 Core if aluminum construction, VIA support, alternate mounting styles and a choice of plate materials matter more than dedicated keys and lighting.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

AULA F75

Qwertykeys Neo60 Core

  • Layout size

    75%

    60%

  • Battery

    4,000 mAh

    2,200 mAh

    A larger battery means fewer cables during the day

  • Case material

    Plastic

    Aluminum

  • Mount style

    Gasket Mount

    PCB Mount

  • Knob

    Yes

    No

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • AULA F75
  • Qwertykeys Neo60 Core
Performance
81
57
Build quality
76
79
Productivity
93
61
Customizability
82
73
Portability
83
86

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The F75 is the more direct fit for gaming, office tasks and media control, with its polling-rate listing, larger layout and dedicated controls. The Neo60 Core takes the modding category through its plate selection, mounting options and named foam kit. Programming is a split: the F75 offers more dedicated keys, while the Neo60 Core adds VIA support. For travel, neither is an unqualified choice because the Neo60 Core is narrower but heavier, while the F75 is lighter and has a listed larger battery.

For gaming

Pick the AULA F75

  • The F75 is listed with a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-key rollover.
  • Its 75% layout retains more dedicated keys than the Neo60 Core's 60% layout.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

AULA F75

4.5

510 owner reviews

Praise
“Works exactly as intended and still works as new. The 2.4 GHz Receiver doesn't communicate correctly and isn't reliable but on BT and Cable it works perfectly”
MegaNoobyYTVerified buyer· via Epomaker
Critique
“I made an order for EPOMAKER x AULA 75 with express shipping on 27/1/24. Emailed the team TWICE. Now its 19/3/24, and i still dont have the item. Very poor service”
Faisal A.Verified buyer· via Epomaker

Qwertykeys Neo60 Core

5.0

14 owner reviews

Praise
“Exceeded my expectations, iv been using my salvation that cost more than double and i feel its better and espcially the even sound throughout the keeb”
martin b.Verified buyer· via Divinikey

Full specs

AULA F75 vs Qwertykeys Neo60 Core specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

15 of 26 specs differ

AULA F75

Qwertykeys Neo60 Core

Typing & switches

Switch options

Linear, Silent
—

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
PCB Mount

Sound dampening

Yes
No

Screw-in stabilizers

Yes
No

Layout

Layout size

75%
60%

Layout standard

ANSI
ANSI, ISO

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Knob

Yes
No

Display

None
None

Media keys

Yes
No

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

1,000 Hz
—

Battery

4,000 mAhBetter
2,200 mAh

USB-C

Yes
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Plastic
Aluminum

Plate material

—
Aluminum, CarbonFiber, FR4, Plastic, POM

Keycaps

ABS, PBT
—

Weight

1,023 g
1,500 g

Dimensions

43 x 143 x 323 mm
18 x 293 x 109 mm

Typing angle

—
8°

Backlight

RGB, south-facing
None

Firmware & software

VIA

No
Yes

N-key rollover

Yes
Yes

Mac & Windows

Yes
No

Extras

Released

2023
2025

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

AULA F755 stores

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

AULA F75

No ISO layout at the stores we track.

Qwertykeys Neo60 Core

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

FAQ

AULA F75 vs Qwertykeys Neo60 Core: your questions

The F75 is the more straightforward pick for gaming because its listing specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate and N-key rollover. It also has a 75% layout, while the Neo60 Core is a more compact 60% board.

The AULA F75 uses a 75% layout, while the Qwertykeys Neo60 Core uses a 60% layout. The Neo60 Core's compact layout omits the function row, dedicated arrow keys and numpad.

Yes, the F75 listing includes a knob and multimedia keys. The vendor describes the knob as a control for volume adjustments or media playback.

Yes, VIA support is listed for the Neo60 Core. The F75 metadata does not list VIA support.

The Neo60 Core has several explicitly listed plate choices, including Carbon Fiber, Aluminum, FR4, POM and plastic. The F75 product details do not list alternate plate options.

Both product listings specify hot-swap capability. The F75 vendor describes full-key hot-swap, while the Neo60 Core listing includes a hotswap PCB option.

The Neo60 Core metadata lists RGB as absent, and its vendor description says it has no per-key RGB. The AULA F75 listing specifies RGB lighting.

The Neo60 Core metadata lists ANSI and ISO layout support. The F75 compatibility details say ISO layouts, including ISO-DE and UK variants, are not offered.

The Neo60 Core is narrower, with listed dimensions of about 293 mm by 109 mm, compared with the F75's 323 mm by 143 mm. The F75 is lighter at 1023 g, while the Neo60 Core is listed at about 1500 g.

The Neo60 Core vendor describes PCB gasket mount and O-ring mount options. Its listing also names a foam kit with a PE sheet, PCB foam and Poron case foam.

No, the F75 is listed as a 75% layout and its compatibility details specify that it has no numpad. The Neo60 Core also has no numpad, as a 60% layout.

The F75 compatibility details warn that north-facing LEDs can cause Cherry-profile keycaps to hit the switch housing. They also note that south-facing LEDs can leave shine-through legends dark, and some sculpted keycaps may clip the LED.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.