Not sure which keyboard to choose? Try the Keyboard Finder now!

Head to head · Prices checked Nov 2, 2026

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Neo80CU75% or TKL Choice

Choose the Neo75 CU for a smaller 75% layout and lighter listed weight, or the Neo80CU for TKL navigation keys and a stated 1000 Hz wired and 2.4 GHz polling rate.

KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Quick verdict

Which one should you get?

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Build quality in the top 40% of 75% boards under $300.

If you want

  • 75% layout with ANSI and ISO support.
  • Tri-mode connectivity option with Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired USB-C, depending on PCB choice.
  • Tool-free ball-catch case access with magnetic connectors, as described by the vendor.

Rules this board out

  • No numpad.

Get the

Qwertykeys Neo80CU

Sound dampening

Build quality in the top 5% of 80% boards under $300.

If you want

  • 80% TKL layout with ANSI and ISO support.
  • Specified 1000 Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4 GHz connections.
  • Three mounting options: Poron gasket, silicone gasket, and top-mount.

Rules this board out

  • No numpad.

Bottom line

Pick the Neo75 CU if a smaller layout, lower listed weight, or tool-free case access matters most. Choose the Neo80CU if you want the TKL layout, three mounting options, and its stated 1000 Hz polling rate over wired or 2.4 GHz. Both are barebone kits, so plan to source switches and keycaps separately.

What actually differs

The differences that matter

Skip the 40-row spec sheet. These are the specs that change how each board feels, sounds, and fits your desk.

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Qwertykeys Neo80CU

  • Layout size

    75%

    80%

  • Case material

    Aluminum

    Aluminum, Brass, Copper

  • Weight

    3,000 g

    4,500 g

    Heavier boards stay planted and lighter ones travel

  • Sound dampening

    No

    Yes

  • Plate material

    Aluminum, CarbonFiber, FR4, Polycarbonate, POM

    Aluminum, CarbonFiber, Plastic

KeebFinder scores

How we score
  • Qwertykeys Neo75 CU
  • Qwertykeys Neo80CU
Performance
57
67
Build quality
72
89
Productivity
62
73
Customizability
69
67
Portability
77
75

What they share

  • Connection: Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
  • Hot-swappable
  • Mount style: Gasket Mount
  • VIA
  • Layout standard: ANSI, ISO
See every spec side by side

Best for

What will you mostly use it for?

The Neo80CU has the edge for gaming, office work, programming, and content creation, mainly through its TKL layout, stated polling rate, and broader mounting and acoustic features. The Neo75 CU is the more suitable travel pick between the two because its listed layout and weight are smaller. For hands-on modding, the Neo75 CU stands out for its tool-free case access and dual-mounting design. Both models support hot-swapping and VIA, so neither has a clear advantage on those shared basics.

For gaming

Pick the Qwertykeys Neo80CU

  • The Neo80CU specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4 GHz connections.
  • Both models offer wired and 2.4 GHz connectivity, plus hot-swap PCBs.

From real owners

What owners say

Ratings and quotes collected from verified store reviews, including the critical ones.

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

5.0

42 owner reviews

Praise
“Couldn't be more happy with the NEO 75. Had a small issue during the assembly but received excellent support from the dealer.”
F.W.Verified buyer· via MonacoKeys

Qwertykeys Neo80CU

5.0

8 owner reviews

Praise
“Looks and feels amazing. Really heavy. Typing is fun again! (I'm using t with Gateron Baby Kangaroo 2.0s)”
Michael G.Verified buyer· via MonacoKeys

Full specs

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Neo80CU specs

Every tracked spec, side by side. Rows marked with a dot differ between the boards.

7 of 20 specs differ

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Qwertykeys Neo80CU

Typing & switches

Hot-swappable

Yes
Yes

Mount style

Gasket Mount
Gasket Mount

Sound dampening

No
Yes

Layout

Layout size

75%
80%

Layout standard

ANSI, ISO
ANSI, ISO

Ergonomics

Standard
Standard

Display

None
None

Connectivity & battery

Connection

Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired
Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, Wired

Max polling rate

—
1,000 Hz

Battery

—
2,200 mAh

USB-C

No
Yes

Build & materials

Case material

Aluminum
Aluminum, Brass, Copper

Plate material

Aluminum, CarbonFiber, FR4, Polycarbonate, POM
Aluminum, CarbonFiber, Plastic

Weight

3,000 g
4,500 g

Dimensions

—
18 x 356 x 134 mm

Typing angle

—
8°

Backlight

None
None

Firmware & software

VIA

Yes
Yes

N-key rollover

No
Yes

Extras

Released

2026
2026

For EU buyers

ISO layouts by store

Which stores sell ISO-DE, UK, and the other regional layouts.

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Qwertykeys Neo80CU

Listed on the product, not split by store: ISO.

Where to buy

Compare prices

Live prices from the stores we track, cheapest in-stock offer first.

Prices in USD are converted to your currency and can change at any time. KeebFinder may earn a commission when you buy through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Lowest price across stores, Amazon excluded.

FAQ

Qwertykeys Neo75 CU vs Neo80CU: your questions

The Neo75 CU is a 75% keyboard, while the Neo80CU is an 80% TKL model. The Neo80CU also specifies a 1000 Hz polling rate for wired and 2.4 GHz connections.

Neither model has a numpad, according to its compatibility rule. The Neo80CU is an 80% TKL layout, while the Neo75 CU is 75%.

The Neo75 CU is listed at 3000 g, compared with 4500 g for the Neo80CU. Both are substantial keyboards, so neither listing suggests a lightweight travel board.

The Neo80CU's vendor specification lists 1000 Hz for wired and 2.4 GHz connections, and 125 Hz over Bluetooth. The Neo75 CU's metadata does not specify a polling rate.

Both models list Bluetooth, 2.4 GHz, and wired connectivity. The Neo75 CU vendor description notes that connectivity depends on the selected PCB, and the Neo80CU's vendor description makes the same distinction.

Both models list hot-swap support. The Neo75 CU's vendor description also offers a solder PCB option, so confirm the selected PCB before ordering if you specifically want hot-swap.

The Neo80CU lists Poron-gasket, silicone-gasket, and top-mount options. The Neo75 CU offers a dual-mounting system with gasket mount and isolated bottom-mount.

The Neo75 CU vendor description specifies a tool-free ball-catch structure with magnetic connectors for opening its case. The Neo80CU vendor description focuses on its mounting and acoustic options rather than describing tool-free case access.

Both models list VIA support. The Neo75 CU vendor description says its PCB options are VIA-compatible, and the Neo80CU vendor description also specifies VIA compatibility.

No, both are barebone kits, and their vendor descriptions say switches and keycaps are sold separately. The Neo75 CU vendor description says stabilizers are included, and the Neo80CU's vendor description also lists included stabilizers.

Neither model lists per-key RGB. The Neo80CU has a Star Ring accent light, while the Neo75 CU is listed without RGB.

The Neo80CU may suit programmers who prefer its 80% TKL layout over the Neo75 CU's 75% layout. Both support VIA, and neither has a numpad.

Still torn?

Answer a few quick questions and the keyboard finder ranks 2,000+ boards by how you will actually use yours.